CARDBOARD VS. VYRA: SHARED EDITING TRIAL BRIEF
Useful in Practice | https://stephenstilwell.com/resources/cardboard-vs-vyra/
Proposed method. Fill in actual observations after a trial.

AUDIENCE AND TASK
Product:
Audience:
One customer task:
Expected visible result:
Starting product plan and account state:

IDENTICAL INPUTS
Consented source recording and version:
Essential scenes:
Target duration and aspect ratio:
Caption and accessibility requirements:
Approved message and call to action:
Claims or material that must not appear:

FIRST EDIT REQUEST
Use the supplied screen recording to show [task] for [audience]. Keep the
actual interface legible. Open with [problem], show [essential steps], finish
with [visible result] and [next action]. Flag missing footage rather than
inventing a feature.

CONTROLLED REVISION
Replace the opening with [new opening]. Correct [caption]. Preserve the
remaining approved sequence. Record what changed unexpectedly.

REPEAT THIS RECORD FOR EACH TOOL
Tool, plan, product version and date:
Input version and settings:
Setup and first-cut time, if measured:
Wrong or missing steps:
Caption and legibility problems:
Revision result and unexpected changes:
Manual cleanup needed and time, if measured:
Export format, resolution and watermark:
Subscription, credits, media and other actual costs:
Final output location:
Pass, retry or reject, with reasons:

DECISION
Which requirements were met?
What remains uncertain?
Who needs to approve the final output?
What should be checked before a recurring subscription?

Keep the brief, original recording, outputs and revision notes together.
Do not enter unmeasured times or costs as observed results.